Moderators: Aldus Marius, Valerius Claudius Iohanes
Actually to me it always had the uncomfortable connotation of being a witch-hunt. Certainly when last year Atticus began interfering with our tasks
Additionally, I would like to point out that, suppose we fall back after this 'census' to about 30 members, I wonder how we will persuade people to join us. Larger numbers make a better impression and may convince people to join, even if many of those numbers are not a reflection of our activity.
Tiberius Dionysius Draco wrote:I remember meeting Lucius Salix Cicero in the chatroom about 4-5 months ago. Does this count as being active?
Gnæus Dionysius Draco wrote:
When this rule was implemented, first by means of edict, then by writing it into the RF in September 2002,
I find your list very disturbing. Of the fourteen names you give as inactive, ten are women. What I see here is a failure on the part of SVR to retain the interest of our female members, or worse still, that SVR somehow discourages the participation of our female members. However it may be, the failure is on the part of SVR. The problem needs to be addressed differently than by attempting to expel most of our female sodales.Quintus Claudius Locatus wrote:- Livia Vatinia Aprilia
- Teresia Oregonia Medica
- Priscilla Vedia Serena
- Persepheia Eleutheria Hadreana
- Anyte Aletheia Helena
- Flavia Valeria Octavia
- Aletheia Iulia Hypathia
- Sokrates Kinetos Barbaros
- Alexandra Eleutheria Eudocia
- Sokrates Eleutherius Callistus
- Caius Iulius Claudianus
- Appius Claudius Falco
- Hiera Iulia Minervina
- Domna Durmia Cintia
I will serve notice here and now that while I intend to use my veto power sparingly, I will nonetheless use it in order to ensure that each individual sodalis receiving a nota is given the opportunity to exercise their right of provocatio. For any action made by the praetores with reference to a general list of defendants I will give serious review.
None the less it stands as a meaningless edictum consularis, and any edicta of a previous consul is subject to be reversed by any succeeding consulares.
It is now in our Regula Fundamentalis, which has been approved by the Comitia; thus representing the vast majority of our members.In accordance with I,7 of our regula fundamentalis
I find your list very disturbing. Of the fourteen names you give as inactive, ten are women. What I see here is a failure on the part of SVR to retain the interest of our female members, or worse still, that SVR somehow discourages the participation of our female members. However it may be, the failure is on the part of SVR. The problem needs to be addressed differently than by attempting to expel most of our female sodales.
though I kind of hoped that both Censores had proven worthy of such trust over the past two years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests