YOUR favourite Roman emperor... vote here!

History, archaeology, historiography, peoples, and personalities of ancient Rome and the Mediterranean.

Moderator: Aldus Marius

Which emperor, from this selection, was, according to you, the most capable ruler?

Augustus
9
30%
Claudius
2
6%
Vespasianus
5
16%
Titus
1
3%
Traianus
2
6%
Hadrianus
3
10%
Antoninus Pius
0
No votes
Marcus Aurelius
5
16%
Septimius Severus
0
No votes
Diocletianus
1
3%
Constantinus ("the Great")
0
No votes
The most capable emperor's not on this list
2
6%
All of them were equally (in)competent
0
No votes
 
Total votes : 30

Postby Q Valerius on Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:28 am

most capable emporer would easily be Augustus, with Constantine running a close second. However, my favorite emporer would be Marcus Aurelius.
Q Valerius
Eques
Eques
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 7:06 am

Postby Tarquinius Dionysius on Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:05 am

Most capable: Augustus. Quite simply one of the most brilliant and influential politicians in the history of the western world.

My favourite: Probably Tiberius. The man is a complete tragedy, and never ceases to fascinate me.

Most entertaining: Heliogabalus, without a doubt. :D
User avatar
Tarquinius Dionysius
Senator
Senator
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Belgica

De Augustiis

Postby Valerius Claudius Iohanes on Fri Sep 14, 2007 12:52 am

Salvete, Quirites -

I agree - I think that Augustus was the most capable, the most all-round effective emperor, and the one who left the greatest achievement - the empire itself.

Others who were successful and are on my own "good emperors" list -
Tiberius (for the common-man attitude shown at times in his reign), Claudius (of course), Vespasianus (a down-to-earth, sensible, even self-mocking tyrant!), Traianus, Hadrianus, M. Aurelius, Claudius Gothicus, Diocletianus, Constantinus.

I also add these two, who were not as successful, but who were (as I see it) "right emperors": Nerva and Julian Apostate.

Valete, amici.
Valerius Claudius Iohannes
Curator anno MMDCCLXII
Centurio Honorarius Societatis

:: Adversitas bono viro intelligentiam docet. ::
User avatar
Valerius Claudius Iohanes
Curator
Curator
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:28 am
Location: Sancti Leandri Oppidum, California Franciscencis, Conpactae Civitates Americae

Postby Gnaeus Dionysius Draco on Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:07 pm

Salve mi Valeri,

It's hard to judge Nerva, of course, but reading up about him, it seems his reign was a financial disaster.

I would judge Augustus's only weakness as the one that eventually undid the Empire (or was, I think) his neglect for establishing a clear-cut system for succession. The five Boni briefly broke this cycle, but it didn't last because Marcus Aurelius also made the fatal error to make Commodus his successor.

Vale bene,
Draco
Gn. Dionysius Draco Invictus
User avatar
Gnaeus Dionysius Draco
Curialis
Curialis
 
Posts: 1618
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 8:04 pm
Location: Belgica

Les Empereurs

Postby Valerius Claudius Iohanes on Fri Sep 14, 2007 7:08 pm

Salve, Draco Clarissime -

[I know - my penchant for superlatives is absurd and probably irritating! But it's part of the general fun of language, I'm afraid.]

Yes, Nerva's reign was NOT a successful one, so he's not on my list of "Most Capable". His balanced budget notions were properly Cato-like, but impractical in social, PR and political terms. Moreover, as I recall (I have to go back to an authority and get my recollections straight) he took an oath never to execute members of the Senate, quite unlike most of the emperors, as it seems to me.

And it was he, as I recall, who first got the adoptive principle of succession going, which is the closest the imperials ever got to fixing Augustus's omission of a hard, dependable succession system. That may have been his greatest contribution, since that was used successfully by his immediate successors. It wasn't original, adoption being a norm in Roman politics, but it was a step away from Caligula and Nero and Domitian, and so on, and back toward good sense. I'm still amazed (I know that, given human nature, I shouldn't be) that for all the effort and dedication and civic-minded philosophy of the Roman elite, creating a binding, elective succession proved so hard to do.

So Nerva's efforts and ideas were impractical, but still seem to me to have been right ideas, and so I put him on my list along with Julian.

Tibique, ut bene valeas.
Valerius Claudius Iohannes
Curator anno MMDCCLXII
Centurio Honorarius Societatis

:: Adversitas bono viro intelligentiam docet. ::
User avatar
Valerius Claudius Iohanes
Curator
Curator
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:28 am
Location: Sancti Leandri Oppidum, California Franciscencis, Conpactae Civitates Americae

Re: Les Empereurs

Postby Tarquinius Dionysius on Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:55 am

Valerius Claudius Iohanes wrote:Moreover, as I recall (I have to go back to an authority and get my recollections straight) he took an oath never to execute members of the Senate, quite unlike most of the emperors, as it seems to me.

Indeed he did (Dio, 68.2.3), but this should not be a surprise considering he owed his accession to the Senate in the first place. But while I'm wondering about it, wasn't Nerva really the only man in Roman history to have been proclaimed emperor solely on the initiative of the Senate? I think you could very nearly call it a democratic election. :)
User avatar
Tarquinius Dionysius
Senator
Senator
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Belgica

Nerva and the Senate

Postby Valerius Claudius Iohanes on Fri Sep 21, 2007 1:50 am

Salve, Tarquinii Dionysii -

I thought there were others, but apparently not. It seems Nerva was the only emperor the Senate itself elected. Every emperor else that I seemed to remember being elevated to his station by the Senate - the Gordians, Pupienus, Balbinus - was, in fact, merely confirmed by the Senate after he had already announced his claim.

Interesting that the Senate could never actually get a hold of any of the military power that the various contestant generals enjoyed. But they were a kind of figurehead pool, by that time, and I guess each emperor would have jealously avoided any initiatives of theirs that could have afforded the senators direct military power.

Vale bene.
Valerius Claudius Iohannes
Curator anno MMDCCLXII
Centurio Honorarius Societatis

:: Adversitas bono viro intelligentiam docet. ::
User avatar
Valerius Claudius Iohanes
Curator
Curator
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:28 am
Location: Sancti Leandri Oppidum, California Franciscencis, Conpactae Civitates Americae

Postby Tarquinius Dionysius on Sun Sep 23, 2007 1:13 pm

Btw, I finished my Wikipedia article on Nerva yesterday. Feel free to check it out: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerva :)
User avatar
Tarquinius Dionysius
Senator
Senator
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: Belgica

De Nerva

Postby Valerius Claudius Iohanes on Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:24 am

Id certe faciam.

Gratias pro notitia. Vale maxime.
Valerius Claudius Iohannes
Curator anno MMDCCLXII
Centurio Honorarius Societatis

:: Adversitas bono viro intelligentiam docet. ::
User avatar
Valerius Claudius Iohanes
Curator
Curator
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 4:28 am
Location: Sancti Leandri Oppidum, California Franciscencis, Conpactae Civitates Americae

Postby Gaius Iulius Tabernarius on Fri Mar 21, 2008 3:59 pm

Augustus, for the first "emperor" of Rome he had a healthy respect for the senate and did much to preserve it.

plus he established peace and prosperity after decades of civil strife and war. I also have a personal attachment to him because he was from a minor family without much fame or political clout.

In all he was a well rounded politician administrator and a responsible head of state. Hard to believe that he was related to Nero and Caligula.
"O Tempora! O Mores!!" Cicero
User avatar
Gaius Iulius Tabernarius
II. Legionary
II. Legionary
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:09 pm
Location: MA, USA

Previous

Return to Collegium Historicum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron